ChatGPT Can Absolutely Hallucinate—Here’s How I Fact-Check It

Did you know that ChatGPT will make stuff up? And it’ll do it confidently.

It might give you fake stats, get a date wrong, or drop a quote that sounds official—but doesn’t actually exist. That’s called AI hallucination, and if you’re using ChatGPT to create content, teach, or inform others, it’s something you can’t afford to ignore.

Most people are using AI the wrong way—and it shows. Their content gets buried by Google and ignored on social. I use ChatGPT daily for myself, my clients, and my business—but I never take its answers at face value. I also teach people how to use it right, because too many are running with half-baked responses and calling it strategy.

Here’s why hallucination happens, what it looks like, and exactly how I keep it in check with a prompt I built to keep it honest. (And yes—this applies to other generative AI tools too: Gemini, Grok, MetaAI, Claude. None of them are immune.)

First—What Does a ChatGPT Hallucination Even Mean?

When ChatGPT “hallucinates,” it’s not lying on purpose. It’s doing what it was trained to do: predict what sounds right based on patterns and language—not verify what’s actually true.

That’s how you end up with:

• Made-up data or stats

• Quotes no one ever said

• Sources that don’t exist

• Dates that are just slightly off

• Overconfident answers with zero context

Sometimes it nails it. Other times? It’s just... confidently wrong.

Why This Matters (Especially If You Use ChatGPT to Create Content)

You can’t build trust or authority on shaky facts. If you’re using ChatGPT to write your blogs, emails, website copy, or social posts—and you’re not fact-checking—you’re playing a risky game.

Your audience might not say anything, but it chips away at your credibility. And if you’re using it to give advice or teach? Multiply that risk.

This isn’t about fear—it’s about responsibility. And professionalism. AI is a tool. You are still the editor.

My Personal Fact-Checking ChatGPT Prompt

Here is a prompt I engineered to ensure the responses I get are factual.

PROMPT STARTS:

"You are the world’s most meticulous fact-checker and elite-level research assistant—trained to support entrepreneurs, educators, content creators, and business owners who rely on ChatGPT to power high-visibility, high-trust work.

You specialize in: – Detecting and eliminating AI hallucinations and unverifiable claims – Validating statistics, quotes, names, and historical or news-related details with precision – Surfacing only primary or evidence-based sources when it comes to medical, legal, scientific, or technical claims – Providing plain-language summaries that help non-experts assess the trustworthiness of information – Supporting thought leadership, internal documentation, and public-facing content with rigorous accuracy standards

STEP 1: Before delivering any response, pause and review it for factual accuracy. Fact-check everything you generate—especially if it includes stats, names, dates, events, studies, institutions, or direct quotes.

STEP 2: In every response, include the following:

– A clear fact-check summary written in plain language – An explanation of any claim you couldn’t verify – A list of clean, copy/paste references (no embedded links) from reliable sources – A reminder if the information is based on patterns or predictions rather than confirmed data

STEP 3: Follow these rules with discipline:

– Triple-check all claims before sending – Do not invent statistics, people, or organizations – Never speculate or guess—say “I couldn’t confirm this” if unsure – Flag outdated, unclear, or conflicting information and explain what needs human review – If I say “Verify that,” pause your default response and re-check the most recent claim for source accuracy

STEP 4: Apply extra caution if the content includes:

– Health, finance, or legal claims – News events or timelines – Direct quotes attributed to public figures – Study results or academic findings – Brand names, tools, or business strategies

⚠️ You are not here to sound confident. You are here to be correct.

Your job is to act as my second brain—filtering the AI noise and helping me protect what matters most: trust, credibility, and clarity.

Assume I’ll still review what you send, because human judgment always matters. But your job is to clean the page before I get there.

PROMPT ENDS.

And If Something Feels Off?

Don’t just delete the answer—call it out. Try:

• “Where did that stat come from?”

• “Double-check the date on that quote.”

• “Can you cite your sources clearly?”

• “Is that a real quote or a made-up example?”

You don’t need to memorize a list of trusted sources. You just need to train ChatGPT to stop winging it—and start backing it up.

ChatGPT is incredible. But it’s not a truth engine—it’s a language engine.

If you’re using it to produce high-quality content, teach, coach, sell, or share anything that matters—you owe it to yourself (and your audience) to fact-check before you hit publish.

And if you want to learn how to actually use ChatGPT the right way—from prompts that work to systems that scale—I teach all of that inside The Girl’s Guide to ChatGPT.

AI won’t replace you—but the people who know how to use it well? They just might.

---

FAQ: ChatGPT, Hallucinations & Fact-Checking

What does it mean when ChatGPT “hallucinates”?

When ChatGPT hallucinates, it generates information that sounds correct but isn’t actually true. This could be made-up stats, fake quotes, incorrect dates, or entirely fictional sources. It’s not lying—it’s completing language patterns, not checking facts.

Why does ChatGPT make up information?

ChatGPT isn’t connected to a real-time database or the internet. It was trained on a mix of data and language patterns, so it predicts what “sounds right” rather than verifying accuracy. That’s why it sometimes confidently shares things that are just plain wrong.

How can I tell if ChatGPT is giving me false or made-up info?Look for:

• Stats or studies with no citations

• Quotes that don’t show up anywhere else online

• Dates that feel slightly off

• Sources you can’t find

• Confident answers with no links or references

If something feels off, trust your gut—and ask ChatGPT to verify it.

Is it safe to use ChatGPT to write blogs or content?

Yes—but only if you treat ChatGPT as a draft assistant, not a final editor. You should always:

• Fact-check every detail

• Ask it to cite sources

• Use prompts that require verification (like the one I share above)

• Review everything with a critical eye

What’s the best prompt to get fact-checked, accurate responses from ChatGPT?

Here’s my personal go-to prompt for fact-checking. I use it daily in my business and teach it to others:“Act as a meticulous fact-checker and expert-level research assistant…”(See full prompt in the article above—this one changes the game.)

Can ChatGPT cite real sources or links?

Yes, but only when prompted clearly—and even then, it can get it wrong. Use prompts that specifically request source links in clean, copy/paste format. And if a source sounds fake or vague, ask follow-ups like “Where did that stat come from?” or “Can you verify that with a reliable source?”

How do I keep ChatGPT from hallucinating?

• Use structured prompts that ask for triple-checking and citations

• Add a step for fact-check summaries

• Flag any unverifiable info

• Treat it like a language tool, not a research expert

What happens if I don’t fact-check AI-generated content?

You risk sharing false information, losing trust with your audience, and getting buried by search algorithms. Google is already prioritizing accuracy and credibility in AI content—and sloppy use of ChatGPT can hurt your brand.

Do you teach how to use ChatGPT the right way?

Yes—I teach business owners, content creators, and everyday users how to use AI correctly. From prompt engineering to content systems, I cover how to get accurate, aligned, and high-performing outputs inside The Girl’s Guide to ChatGPT and also ChatGPTcourses.ai.